Performance Analysis of Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Controller for Aircraft Pitch Control
Abstract
Because it was adjusted manually in the early days of aviation, maintaining an aircraft's
pitch at the appropriate degree required constant pilot attention. The effectiveness of the
aircraft system depends on a well-designed tracking controller to stabilize the aircraft
pitch and follow the intended reference signal because the aircraft system is a highly
nonlinear and unstable system. The performance analysis of STSMC, which is employed
for tracking control of aircraft pitch with dynamic pressure change and external
disturbance, is the main emphasis of this research work. The SMC controller is also used
for comparisons. By employing the PSO algorithm to minimize the IAEU, the proposed
STSMC controller parameters are produced. Both controllers' tracking capabilities using
various reference signals are tested using MATLAB software, as well as the durability of
their performance when subjected to dynamic pressure change and external disturbance
force. By lowering the settling time, rise time, and peak time by 76.72%, 77.40%, and
65.35%, respectively, the obtained simulation results show that the STSMC approach
beats the SMC. Similar to this, by reducing the IAEU value for both multiple step signals
and ramp signals, the STSMC retains superior tracking performance. Both controllers'
performance resilience is evaluated utilizing dynamic pressure fluctuations of up to 10%
increment and an outside disturbance force. The suggested STSMC control approach
yields peak times, rise times, and settling times in the 10% increment of dynamic pressure
of 0.1750sec, 0.0877sec, and 0.1073sec, respectively. These times are small in compared
to the SMC. The STSMC provides 0.1620sec, 0.0785sec, and 0.0951sec of peak, rising,
and settling times during the external disturbance force rejection test. The STSMC
provides 0.4314sec, 0.1879sec, and 0.6145sec of peak time, rise time, and settling time,
respectively, which are all minimal compared to the SMC, for the tracking performance
robustness against both dynamic pressure fluctuations and external disturbance force.
The simulation outcomes generally demonstrated that the proposed STSMC outperformed
the SMC controller in terms of tracking performance and robustness against dynamic
pressure variation and external disturbance force.
