Error Analysis In Written English Sentences:Grade Eleven Efl Learners Ra-E Meles Preparatory School In Focus
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The prime objective of this study was to examine types of syntactic writing errors most frequently
committed by learners as well as possible causes of these errors at preparatory level. To this
end, the data for this research were drawn from 11 EFL teachers and 46 students. Writing test
and questionnaire were used as instruments of data collection for the present study. First, the
EFL learners’ written productions, specifically paragraphs and sentences, were analyzed using
error analysis approach to find out the most frequent syntactic errors that the EFL learners
commit. The errors were identified and calculated in percentages. The results of the study
indicate that the total number of errors committed by the 39 EFL students was 967 in written
paragraphs. The result showed that the errors committed in the use of verb tense had the highest
percentage, which accounts for 11.58% of the total errors. The second most common error was
wrong use of English articles, which accounts for 10.9% of the total error. Errors of
capitalization which accounts for 9.4% of the errors came as the third most common error
committed by the students. Apart from this, the researcher designed erroneous English sentence
to notice learners’ ability in detecting types of written syntactic errors. Results displayed that
run-on sentence, verb tense, and wrong uses of articles were the most difficult structural
elements for EFL learners to master. Furthermore, the analysis of the data collected from EFL
teachers close-ended questionnaire showed that errors related to use of active /passive form with
the frequency rate of (4.27), part of speech (4.18), articles (4.09), and conjunction (4.0) mean
value were more frequently committed as compared to other syntactic errors. Regarding
communication effect taxonomy, a comparison of error types was made. Results indicated that of
the 14 syntactic errors provided to the EFL teachers, eight errors were viewed local. Other four
errors were considered global. These include verb tens, wrong word order, run-on sentence, and
fragment. In connection to the sources of second language learners’ syntactic writing errors, all
the EFL teacher participants responded that complexity of the English language, learners’ lack
of knowledge about certain language structures were among the major causes of errors. The
error analysis also revealed that among all given intra-lingual causes, false concept
hypothesized followed by over generalization received higher percentages than others. In light of
the obtained results, group of recommendations were suggested in order to help EFL teachers in
their attempt to reduce the difficulties concerning writing English sentences among English
learners as second language.
